- validity of digital agreements; legal relationships; legal uncertainty; e-commerce; imbalance of legal positions
- https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-chasopis/1.2025.72
- Pages 72-82
Notaries are following the legislation and the Code of Ethics. One of these obligations is to guard the interests of the relevant parties, which may include the deposit of certificates. However, depositing certificates is not explicitly part of the notary duties but rather a means of protecting the interests of the concerned parties. Consequently, there is a normative ambiguity in Article 16 Paragraph 1 letter h of the Notary Law. The study taked a normative legal approach, using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials to analyse this inconsistency. The study aimed to provide legal certainty regarding the notary obligation in depositing certificates. The findings indicated that, at present, notaries do not have legal protection when accepting the deposit of ownership certificates as a means of safeguarding the interests of the related parties. According to Gustav Radbruchʼs theory, this causes legal uncertainty, which necessitates legal reform to ensure protection for notaries and to clarify each of their obligations. The absence of clear legal provisions creates a risk for notaries, as they may face legal consequences despite acting in good faith to protect the interests of the involved parties. Furthermore, this ambiguity can cause inconsistent interpretations of notarial duties, affecting both notaries and the parties relying on their services. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce legal reforms that provide explicit regulations regarding the deposit of certificates by notaries. Such reforms would establish a clear framework for notaries to operate within, ensuring their protection while maintaining their professional responsibilities. A more comprehensive legal framework would enhance legal certainty and ensure that notaries can fulfil their duties without fear of legal repercussions, ultimately reinforcing the integrity of the notarial profession
References
[1] Adjie, H. (2023). Legal study regarding the responsibilities of notaries in providing social services in accordance with the implementation of their position. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(8), article number e1435. doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i8.1435.
[2] Amirullah, R. (2021). Notaryʼs responsibility for the transfer of certificate of land rights owned by the prospective seller to another notary at the unilateral request of the prospective buyer. (Master thesis, Gadjah Mada University, Jakarta, Indonesia).
[3] Borman, M.S. (2019). The position of notaries as public officials in the perspective of the notary law. Journal of Law and Notary, 3(1), 74-83. doi: 10.33474/hukeno.v3i1.1920.
[4] Dias Menezes, L., de Araújo, L.V., & Nishijima, M. (2023). Blockchain and smart contract architecture for notaries services under civil law: A Brazilian experience. International Journal of Information Security, 22, 869-880. doi: 10.1007/s10207-023-00673-3.
[5] Dolynska, M. (2023). Evolution of legal regulation of digitalisation of notarial activity in independent Ukraine. Social and Legal Studios, 6(4), 58-68. doi: 10.32518/sals4.2023.58.[6] Fariyansa, M. (2016). Sale and purchase of stored land without a certificate from civil law perspective and maqasid Al-Syariʼahdi Surabaya. (Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia).
[7] Hamda, T.Z.Y., Rinaldi, Y., & Abdurrahman, T. (2021). The legal authority of natory toward document confidential of the parties other than notary protocol. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 6(2), 189-205. doi: 10.33760/jch.v6i2.299.
[8] Kamran, M., Zainuddin, Rahman, S., & Pawennei, M. (2024). Notary’s responsibility in the exercise of authority as an authentic deed official. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(4), article number e3342. doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.3342.
[9] Marzuki, P.M. (2010). Legal research. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
[10] Morina Ramadi, T. (2022). Legal consequences of depositing land title certificates with notaries/ppat regarding the certificate name change process in Padang city. (S2 thesis, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia).
[11] Oktaviany, C., Muhjad, M.H., & Haiti, D. (2022). The principle of recognising notary service users is linked to the responsibilities of the notaryʼs position. Balrev, 4(1), 46-58.
[12] Park, J.-R., & Noe, S.-O. (2022). Reflections on the possibility of replacing the registration system with a blockchain system. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 29(7), 169-179. doi: 10.9708/ jksci.2024.29.07.169.
[13] Praminda Yona Mandela, S. (2019). Legal protection for notaries regarding the custody of sales and purchase agreement certificates (PPJB). (Master thesis, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia).
[14] Putri, N.M., & Marlyna, H. (2021). Violation of office and unlawful acts committed by notaries in exercising their authority. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, 5(1), 63-77. doi: 10.23920/acta.v5i1.644.
[15] Radbruch, G. (1961). Introduction to jurisprudence. Stuttgart: Koehler Verlag.
[16] Rahman, T.A. (2019). Analysis of the competence of the district court regarding the revocation of land ownership certificates. In the Decision of Civil Case Number: 189/Pdt/2014/PN. (Doctoral thesis, Riau Islamic University, Riau, Indonesia).
[17] Ramadhani, R. (2022). The legal position of sale and purchase agreement (PPJB) in the activities of registration of transfer of land rights. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 3(1), 45-50. doi: 10.55357/is.v3i1.212.
[18] Rizkia, N.D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2022). The role of notaries in digital transformation for the welfare of Indonesian society. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 8(2), 310-323. doi: 10.31599/sasana.v8i2.1281.
[19] Saida Flora, H. (2021). Responsibilities of substitute notaries in making deeds. Kanun Journal of Legal Studies, 19(57), 179-199.
[20] Soraya, L.F. (2020). Determination of sanction clauses in property sale and purchase agreements with a pre- project selling system (analysis of the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11/PRT/M/2019). (Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia).
[21] Triani, D. (2019). Legal analysis of certificate deposit with Notary/PPAT related to land rights transfer process (study of District Court Decision Number 53/PID.B/2017/PN.BKT). Retrieved from https://repositori.usu. ac.id/handle/123456789/27574.
[22] Wulan, S., Warman, K., & Yoserwan, Y. (2023). Custody of land certificates at the notary office in the preparation of deed of sale and purchase of land in Bukittinggi City. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 3297-3309. doi: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1125.
[23] Yao, J. & Hui, P. (2021). Blockchain certificate deposit, electronic signing, strengthening notarization – a new model of dealing with creditor’s rights disputes. In V. Chang, M. Ramachandran & V. Méndez Muñoz (Eds.), Modern industrial IoT, big data and supply chain. Smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol. 218 (pp. 333-339). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-6141-6_36.