Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 16.03.2023,
  • Revised 16.03.2023,
  • Accepted 16.03.2023
Download article Download article
Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020
  • suspicion; notice; notice of suspicion; suspect; written notice of suspicion; service of a written notice of suspicion; service of a notice of suspicion to a person staying in temporary occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
  • https://doi.org/10.33270/04202002.64
  • Pages 64-72

The purpose of the article is to analyse the peculiarities of legal regulation of serving the notice of suspicion to a person whose location has been established, who resides and/or stays in temporary occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as establishment of current theoretical and practical problems in serving a written notice of suspicion to a person located in temporary occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Methodology. In view of the said aim, specificity of the object and subject of the research, the methodological tool has been chosen. During the research, a system of methods of scientific cognition has been applied: the formal logic (abstraction, analogy, deduction, induction, synthesis) – to study the content of the matter under consideration; the systematic analysis – to outline directions of improvement of criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine; the theoretical approach – in the process of study of scientific, educational and methodological literature. The scientific novelty consists in the systematic analysis of the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine, taking into account the requirements of international treaties, the consent to binding force of which has been granted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, as well as determination of theoretical and practical problems, which, if not solved, may lead to non-compliance of the procedural activity of the prosecution when serving a written notice of suspicion to a person who resides and/or stays in temporary occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions, with the objectives of criminal proceeding and the warrantees set out by the international treaties. The ways of solving the given practical problem have been suggested. Based on the results of the conducted research, the following conclusions have been drawn: 1) since the obligation to serve a written notice of suspicion, as an integral part of notifying a person of suspicion, is entrusted with the prosecution, after establishment by whom of the data on the person's location, residing and/or staying in temporary occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions, it is the obligation of the state of Ukraine to take all available measures to promote and protect the rights of its citizens being temporary beyond its control, by applying the provisions of Section IX of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine by an investigator, prosecutor; 2) when the prosecution establishes data on the person’s location, who resides and/or stays in temporary occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions, an investigator, prosecutor undertakes to apply to the Russian Federation for international legal assistance, for carrying out the relevant procedural actions, namely, serving a person with a notice of suspicion, as at present the Russian Federation exercises «effective control» over the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine, in connection with which it is obliged to guarantee the implementation of Article 1 of the Convention; 3) the procedure for serving a notice of suspicion to a person located in temporary occupied Donetsk and Luhansk regions requires legal improvement by means of making the relevant amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine or specials laws. Herewith, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and requirements of international treaties, the consent to obligatory force of which shall be granted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, must be taken into account.

References

[1] Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. No. 4651-VI. (2012, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text

[2] Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Criminal and Criminal Procedure Codes of Ukraine Concerning the Inevitability of Punishment for Certain Crimes against the Fundamentals of National Security, Public Security and Corruption Crimes”. No. 1689-VII. (2014, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/1689-18#Text

[3] Law of Ukraine “On the peculiarities of state policy to ensure the state sovereignty of Ukraine in the temporarily occupied territories in Donetsk and Luhansk regions”. No. 2268-VIII. (2018, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2268-19#Text

[4] Decree of the President of Ukraine “On the boundaries and list of districts, cities, towns and villages, parts of their territories, temporarily occupied in Donetsk and Luhansk regions” No. 32/2019. (2019, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/32/2019#Text

[5] Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950, November). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004.#Text

[6] Law of Ukraine “On ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens and the legal regime in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine”. No. 1207-VII. (2014, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/1207-18#Text

[7] Abrisketa, J., & Casas, M.N. (2016). Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[8] Alenin, Yu.P., & Hloviuk, I.V. (2014). Suspicion messages: General characteristics and improvement problems. Bulletin of the Southern Regional Center of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 1, 161-169.

[9] Lugina, N.A. (2019). Features of delivery of the notice of suspicion and the order of a call of the persons who are in the antiterrorist operation zone. In Reforming Criminal Proceedings in Ukraine: Criminal Procedural and Forensic Aspects: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 195-199). Irpin: National University.

[10]Case of Pishchalnikov v. Russia. Application No. 7025/04. (2009, September). Retrieved from https:// hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22fulltext%22:[%227025/04%22]

[11]Law of Ukraine “On the implementation of decisions and application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights”. No. 3477-IV. (2006, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/3477-15#Text

[12]Notice on the official website of Ukrposhta Joint-Stock Company. (2020). Retrieved from https://www. ukrposhta.ua/ua/news/57016-robota-ukrposhti-v-doneckij-ta-luganskij-oblastjah. [13]Khakhanovskyi, V.H., Luhina, N.A., & Tupchii, V.V. (2017). Peculiarities of the procedure for summoning and notifying about suspicion of persons located in the anti-terrorist operation zone or in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine. International Legal Bulletin: Current Issues (Theory and Practice), 1(5), 87-92.

[14]Case of Ivanţoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia. Application No. 23687/05. (2011, November). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-107480%22]}.

[15]Tatarov, O.Yu. (2017). Legislative tendencies in the criminal process of Ukraine. Bulletin of Criminal Proceedings, 3, 70-81.

[16]Law of Ukraine “On the Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, the First Protocol and Protocols No. 2, 4, 7 and 11 to the Convention”. No. 475/97-VR. (1997, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/475/97-%D0%B2%D1%80.#Text