Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 18.12.2025,
  • Revised 26.03.2026,
  • Accepted 26.05.2026
  • Published 08.07.2026
Download article Download article
Volume 16, No. 2, 2026
  • open-source information; personal data; declarations; registers; disinformation; deepfakes; illicit enrichment
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-chasopis/2.2026.18
  • Pages 18-30

The purpose of the study was to examine legal constraints, procedural requirements, and practical challenges arising during the recording, verification, and use of information from open sources in proceedings concerning public office offences. Contextual, legal and regulatory, and problem-oriented analysis methods were employed to achieve the purpose. Given the increasing trend in the number of such offences in 2024-2025, the use of information from open sources is appropriate for the timely identification of criminal schemes, prevention of losses, and strengthening of public trust in state institutions. The study drew on an examination of the regulatory framework and contextual analysis to identify strengths and prospects of evidence collection from open sources, including broad access to relevant information, rapid data acquisition, and the possibility of investigating offences across different segments of state activity, including military, educational, medical, and other domains. The analysis found a number of problems and risks with using open-source information, such as the lack of standard procedures, limited technical skills, and possible ethical issues. Examination of these challenges informed recommendations aimed at improving the effectiveness of using open sources in the investigation of public office offences. Improvement of investigative effectiveness involved transformation across multiple dimensions, particularly regulatory, procedural, institutional, staffing, methodological, technical, ethical, and control-related aspects. The results of the study may be used by legislators to improve the regulatory framework, by law enforcement bodies and investigators to enhance the effectiveness and quality of investigations into public office offences, by researchers for further analysis of methodologies for processing information from open sources, and by educational institutions for the development of training programmes and courses on the use of digital evidence in criminal proceedings

References

  1. Adionyi, C. (2024). Harnessing OSINT to enhance the investigation of economic crimes. Journal of Anti-Corruption Law, 8, 159-174.
  2. Amelin, O.Yu. (2024). Certain aspects of the appointment and replacement of a prosecutor in criminal proceedings on crimes in the sphere of official activities. Rule of Law, 56, 143-154. doi: 10.18524/2411-2054.2024.56.315691.
  3. Amelin, O.Yu., Pyniaha, R., Zaloznyi, R., Dmytrova, O., & Kryvoshlykov, S. (2025). Investigation of criminal offences in the field of official activity: Analysis of international experience and the possibility of its application in Ukraine. International Annals of Criminology, 63(4), 768-790. doi: 10.1017/cri.2025.10110.
  4. Avrahami, Z., Zwilling, M., & Hajaj, C. (2025). Leveraging OSINT for advanced proactive cybersecurity: Strategies and solutions. IEEE Access, 13, 154229-154250. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3603868.
  5. Bilous, V., Bodnenko, D., Khokhlov, O., Lokaziuk, O., & Stadnik, I. (2024). Open source intelligence for war crime documentation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3654, 368-375.
  6. Bocharov, S., Tyshchuk, V., & Bielai, S. (2025). Use of OSINT in operational and investigative activities: Tools and legal aspects. State Security, 1(5), 25-30. doi: 10.33405/2786-8613/2025/1/5/336692.
  7. Breuer, N. (2025). Testing the reliability of OSINT network data for investigating organized crime infiltration of legal-market businesses. Global Crime. doi: 10.1080/17440572.2025.2567277.
  8. Council of Europe Office in Ukraine. (2022). The Council of Europe supports training on OSINT tools for prosecutors and investigators of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/kyiv/-/the-council-of-europe-supports-training-on-osint-tools-for-prosecutors-and-investigators-of-ukraine.
  9. Huang, H.-W., Shih, C.-H., Li, C.-Yu., & Teng, H.-Yu. (2025). A blockchain-based framework for OSINT evidence collection and identification. Future Internet, 17(12), article number 551. doi: 10.3390/fi17120551.
  10. Ivkova, V.S., & Opirskyy, I.R. (2025). Research of existing OSINT tools and approaches in the context of personal and state information security. Computer Systems and Networks, 7(1), 143-159. doi: 10.23939/csn2025.01.143.
  11. Karakikes, A., & Kotis, K. (2025). AI-assisted OSINT/SOCMINT for sefeguarding boarders: A systematic review. Information, 16(12), article number 1095. doi: 10.3390/info16121095.
  12. Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. (2025). EUAM experts launch OSINT training course for KhNUIA representatives. Retrieved from https://univd.edu.ua/en/news/22784.
  13. Koenig, A. (2024). Ethical considerations for open-source investigations into international crimes. AJIL Unbound, 118, 45-50. doi: 10.1017/aju.2024.2.
  14. Konieczny, M., & Wiecej, P. (2025). Anti-OSINT methods ensuring protection of personal data in the context of cybercrime. Annuals of the Administration and Law, 1(25), 127-144. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0055.1100.
  15. Kosokhatko, B.S. (2025). Problems of using open-source intelligence in the investigation of crimes committed within the framework of an international armed conflict. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series Law, 3(88), 277-284. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.3.41.
  16. Lehominova, S., Shchavinsky, Yu.V., Rabchun, D., Zaporozhchenko, M., & Budzynskyi, O. (2024). The threats of OSINT tools and ways to mitigate the consequences of their application for the organization. Cybersecurity Education Science Technique, 1(25), 294-303. doi: 10.28925/2663-4023.2024.25.294303.
  17. Millett, E. (2023). Open-source intelligence, armed conflict, and the rights to privacy and data protection. doi: 10.58866/HQKE7327.
  18. Mukhopadhyay, A., Venkatagiri, S., & Luther, K. (2024). OSINT research studios: A flexible crowdsourcing framework to scale up open source intelligence investigations. Proceedings of the American Association for Computing Machinery. Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), article number 105. doi: 10.1145/3637382.
  19. National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. (2024a). Steadfastness and efficiency: NABU and SAPO results in the first half of 2024. Retrieved from https://nabu.gov.ua/en/news/nepokhytnist-ta-efektyvnist-rezul-taty-roboty-nabu-i-sap-u-pershomu-pivrichchi-2024-roku/.
  20. National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. (2024b). The results of the first half of 2024 indicate that NABU and SAPO are reaching new heights in eradicating corruption: The latest high-profile cases involve former and current top officials committing corruption crimes here and now. Retrieved from https://reports.nabu.gov.ua/en/archive/nabu-zvit-za-i-pivrichchia-2024/investigations-1-2024.
  21. National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. (2025a). The first half of 2025 was marked by a number of high-profile relations for NABU and SAPO, particularly in the defence, land, and medical sectors. As in previous periods, the emphasis was on exposing high-level corruption taking place in the context of full-scale aggression by the Russian Federation. Retrieved from https://reports.nabu.gov.ua/investigations/.
  22. National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine. (2025b). Report. II half of 2024. Retrieved from https://nabu.gov.ua/site/assets/files/48751/zvit_2024_ii_ukr-1.pdf.
  23. National School of Judges of Ukraine. (2025). Application of OSINT in judicial practice: From legal foundations to practical cases. Retrieved from https://www.nsj.gov.ua/ua/news/zastosuvannya-osint-u-sudoviy-praktitsi-vid-pravovih-osnov-do-praktichnih-keysiv.
  24. Radeiko, R.I. (2025). Theoretical and legal framework for the admissibility of OSINT evidence from social networks: Procedural requirements and methodological approaches (case study No. 990/232/24). Scientific Notes of Lviv University of Business and Law, 45, 110-116. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15648855.
  25. Rajamaki, J., Lahti, I., & Parviainen, J. (2022). OSINT on the dark web: Child abuse material investigations. Information & Security, 53(1), 21-32. doi: 10.11610/isij.5302.
  26. Rajamaki, J., & Tiitta, K. (2024). Implementation of OSINT for improving an international finance sector organization’s cybersecurity. International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, 19(1), 612-616. doi: 10.34190/iccws.19.1.1977.
  27. Ramadhany, G.P. (2024). Open-source intelligence (OSINT) tools for law enforcement. Endless: International Journal of Future Studies, 7(3), 21-33.
  28. Sazibur, R. (2025). The art of open source intelligence (OSINT): Addressing cybercrime, opportunities, and challenges. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5281845.
  29. Scuro, V. (2025). Open-source intelligence (OSINT) for researchers and practitioners. In E. Smith & S. Austin (Eds.), Researching a rigged game: Digital approaches to tracing the illicit trade in cultural objects (pp. 11-28). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-02014-7_2.
  30. Supreme Court of Ukraine. (2024). Supreme Court Judges discussed with experts the issue of admissibility of electronic evidence obtained from open sources. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/1282146/.
  31. Supreme Court of Ukraine. (2025). OSINT as evidence in the investigation of war crimes: Representatives of the Supreme Court participated in a thematic seminar. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/1883443/.
  32. Szymoniak, S., & Foks, K. (2024). Open source intelligence opportunities and challenges – a review. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 18(3), 123-139. doi: 10.12913/22998624/186036.
  33. Ukrinfopress. (2025). Judge with millions in assets: SAPO exposed illegal; enrichment of over UAH 16 million. Retrieved from https://ukrinfopress.com/2025/09/suddya-z-milyonnym-maynom-sap-vykryla-nezakonne-zbahachennya-na-ponad-16-mln-hrn-ukrinfopres.
  34. Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union. (2021). War and justice: How investigators can effectively use OSINT and what to do with “court” decisions in uncontrolled territories. Retrieved from https://helsinki.org.ua/articles/viyna-ta-pravosuddia-iak-slidchym-efektyvno-vykorystovuvaty-osint-ta-shcho-robyty-iz-rishenniamy-sudiv-na-nepidkontrolnykh-terytoriiakh.
  35. Van Puyvelde, D., & Tabarez Rienzi, F. (2025). The rise of open-source intelligence. European Journal of International Security, 10(4), 530-544. doi: 10.1017/eis.2024.61.
  36. Van der Woude, M., & Torres, G. (2024). The ethics of open source investigations: Navigating privacy challenges in a gray zone information landscape. Sage Journals, 26(10), 2184-2202. doi: 10.1177/14648849241274104.
  37. Wang, H., Li, Ya., Huang, Zh., & Dou, Y. (2022). IMCI: Integrate multi-view contextual information for fact extraction and verification. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2208.14001.
  38. Yadav, A., Kumar, A., & Singh, V. (2023). Open-source intelligence: A comprehensive review of the current state, applications and future perspectives in cyber security. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 12407-12438. doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10454-y.
  39. Yuthvek, M.J., Adheena, S., Charithra, Y., & Kalaiselvi, K. (2024). Analyzing business crimes by implementing OSINT architecture. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences, 15(83), 72456-72464.