en

Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 03.02.2026,
  • Revised 01.05.2026,
  • Accepted 26.05.2026
  • Published 08.07.2026
Download article Download article
Volume 16, No. 2, 2026
  • economic concentration; dominant position; market power; digital platforms; international standards
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-chasopis/2.2026.75
  • Pages 75-89

The aim of the study was to identify areas for improving constitutional and legal mechanisms to countering monopolism and unfair competition. Formal-legal, comparative-legal, case-study, and legal modelling methods were used. The study demonstrated that the constitutional and legal model for regulating competition in the Republic of Azerbaijan is based on a combination of guarantees of freedom of entrepreneurship and the permissibility of state intervention to limit monopolistic activity. It was established that the previous antimonopoly regulation system, established between 1993 and 1998, was characterised by fragmented legal regulation, insufficient coordination of mechanisms for controlling economic concentration, dominant positions, and unfair competition, and was focused on suppressing existing violations. The study substantiated the need to improve legal mechanisms for preventing anticompetitive behaviour, strengthen controls over economic concentration, and adapt competition legislation to the conditions of the digital economy. A comparative-legal analysis of the current legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan, European Union legislation, and international approaches to competition regulation demonstrated Azerbaijan’s transition to a systemic model of competition control, which provides for the interrelated regulation of economic concentration, dominance, and unfair competition, as well as the partial implementation of international competition law standards. As a comparative context, it was established that international anti-monopoly mechanisms evolved from monitoring cartels and abuse of dominance to preventive regulation of digital markets and the platform economy. It was also revealed that the European Union developed a specific model for regulating digital platforms in 2020-2025, extending antimonopoly control to algorithmic governance, the use of user data, and digital infrastructure. The results of the study can be used by the legislature of the Republic of Azerbaijan, bodies implementing state competition policy and antimonopoly control, and academic institutions in improving competition legislation, developing mechanisms for regulating digital markets, and preparing proposals for harmonising the national antimonopoly control system with international competition law standards

References

  1. Abdullayev, K., Abdullayev, R., Yusifov, E., Babazade, I., & Fataliyeva, G. (2024). Main areas of development of the digital economy in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Economics of Development, 23(1), 78-88. doi: 10.57111/econ/1.2024.78.
  2. Aghayev, R. (2023). Will Azerbaijan’s Competition Code be a tool for a highly monopolized economy? Retrieved from https://bakuresearchinstitute.org/en/will-azerbaijans-competition-code-be-a-tool-for-a-highly-monopolized-economy/.
  3. Antitrust: Commission fines Google €1.49 billion for abusive practices in online advertising. (2019). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_1770.
  4. Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections to Amazon for the use of non-public independent seller data and opens second investigation into its e-commerce business practices. (2020). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2077.
  5. Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections to Apple on App Store rules for music streaming providers. (2021). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_2061.
  6. Aydin, U. (2026). Competition law and transitions to and away from democracy. European Law Journal, 32(1), 26-37. doi: 10.1111/eulj.70017.
  7. Bakalinska, O., Honcarenko, O., Kaptsova, T., & Babadzhanian, H. (2022). Advocacy of competition in the world and Ukraine: Comparative characteristics. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(16), 145-158. doi: 10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-n000428.
  8. Banalieva, E.R., & Dhanaraj, C. (2019). Internalization theory for the digital economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(8), 1372-1387. doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00243-7.
  9. Bergkamp, P.A. (2021). The proposed EU Digital Markets Act: A new era for the digital economy in Europe. European Company Law, 18(5), 152-161. doi: 10.54648/eucl2021020.
  10. Bernatt, M. (2025). Competition law through the lenses of national constitutions: Connecting competitive markets with socio-economic and environmental values. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 13(2), 284-314. doi: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnae047.
  11. Carbonara, E., & Santarelli, E. (2023). The impact of constitutional protection of economic rights on entrepreneurship: A taxonomic survey. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 126-223. doi: 10.1561/0300000105.
  12. Cini, M., & Czulno, P. (2022). Digital single market and the EU competition regime: An explanation of policy change. Journal of European Integration, 44(1), 41-57. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.2011260.
  13. Crémer, J., de Montjoye, Y.-A., & Schweitzer, H. (2019). Competition policy for the digital era. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2763/407537.
  14. Cseres, K.J. (2021). Intersection of competition and regulation in abuse of dominance and monopolization. Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-36; Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance Research Paper No. 2021-03.
  15. Daems, I. (2022). The complexity and practical challenges of implementing the new DMA. Competition Law & Policy Debate, 7(3), 106-112. doi: 10.4337/clpd.2022.03.01.
  16. Directorate-General for Competition, & Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. (2024). Commission opens non-compliance investigations against Alphabet, Apple and Meta under the Digital Markets Act. Retrieved from https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/commission-opens-non-compliance-investigations-against-alphabet-apple-and-meta-under-digital-markets-2024-03-25_en.
  17. Fazio, E. (2022). Adapting competition law to the digital transition. Two challenges. European Papers, 7(3), 981-992. doi: 10.15166/2499-8249/601.
  18. Gawer, A., & Bonina, C. (2024). Digital platforms and development: Risks to competition and their regulatory implications in developing countries. Information and Organization, 34(3), article number 100525. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100525.
  19. Guliyeva, A. (2025). State support for entrepreneurship in Azerbaijan, 2020-2025: Policies, programs, and outcomes. Gate of the Universes, 1(7), 94-103. doi: 10.69760/portuni.0107008.
  20. Guluzade, T. (2025). Development prospects of the digital economy in Azerbaijan. Gate of the Universes, 1(7), 51-59. doi: 10.69760/portuni.0107006.
  21. Huseynov, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Hamidova, L., & Samedova, E. (2025). Challenges and opportunities of digital economy development: Case of Azerbaijan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(2), 265-276. doi: 10.21511/ppm.23(2).2025.18.
  22. Khalilov, A. (2024). The concept and essence of the principle of subsidiarity in the field of constitutional law in the Republic of Azerbaijan. European Law Science, 1, 21-24. doi: 10.32782/chern.v1.2024.4.
  23. Kovacic, W.E., & Shapiro, C. (2000). Antitrust policy: A century of economic and legal thinking. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 43-60. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.1.43.
  24. OECD-GVH Regional Centre for Competition in Budapest. (2024). Competition policy in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Advocacy of competition. Retrieved from https://competition.gov.az/storage/files/files/1427/oecd-gvh-newsletter23-january2024-en.pdf.
  25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Competition policy in digital markets: The combined effect of ex ante and ex post instruments in G7 jurisdictions. doi: 10.1787/80552a33-en.
  26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Recommendation of the Council concerning effective action against hard core cartels. Retrieved from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/193/193.en.pdf.
  27. Panda, B.N.P. (2025). Economic liberty in digital market and digital competition legislation: Indian context. Law and World, 11(35), 1-11. doi: 10.36475/11.3.1.
  28. Podszun, R. (2023). From competition law to platform regulation – regulatory choices for the digital markets act. Economics, 17(1), article number 20220037. doi: 10.1515/econ-2022-0037.
  29. Podszun, R., Bongartz, P., & Langenstein, S. (2021). The digital markets act: Moving from competition law to regulation for large gatekeepers. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 10(2), 60-67.
  30. Robertson, V.H.S.E. (2024). The complementary nature of the Digital Markets Act and the EU antitrust rules. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 12(2), 325-330. doi: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnae013.
  31. Skara, G., Muçollari, O., & Hajdini, B. (2024). Adapting the competition policy for the digital age: assessing the EU’s approach. Laws, 13(5), article number 64. doi: 10.3390/laws13050064.
  32. Tirole, J. (2023). Competition and the industrial challenge for the digital age. Annual Review of Economics, 15, 573-605. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-090622-024222.
  33. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2000). The United Nations set of principles and rules on competition. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdrbpconf10r2.en.pdf.
  34. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). Enforcing competition law in digital markets and ecosystems: Policy challenges and options. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ciclpd74_en.pdf.