en

Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 10.12.2025,
  • Revised 04.03.2026,
  • Accepted 31.03.2026
  • Published 03.04.2026
Download article Download article
Volume 16, No. 1, 2026
  • overt investigative (detective) actions; war crimes; formation of the evidentiary base; information gathering; interview
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-chasopis/1.2026.65
  • Pages 65-85

The relevance of this article stems from the fact that, in the context of the Russian Federation’s large-scale war against Ukraine, there is a growing need for the proper documentation of evidence, specifically through the interrogation of victims and witnesses in proceedings related to torture and the unlawful detention of civilians by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The aim of the article was to examine the specifics of conducting interrogations in criminal proceedings concerning crimes related to cases of torture and unlawful detention. To achieve this aim, a wide range of scientific research methods were employed, including empirical, structural and systemic approaches. The theoretical basis of this work was formed by the works of both domestic and foreign researchers, dedicated to a detailed examination of issues related to the interrogation of victims and witnesses in cases concerning the torture and unlawful detention of civilians. An in-depth analysis of these academic sources contributed to the formulation of well-reasoned conclusions. The study identified the specific features of interrogations victims and witnesses in proceedings concerning crimes committed by members of the armed forces of the Russian Federation, as well as in the development of tactical approaches to interrogation, taking into account the specific nature of this category of offences. The research has shown that when conducting interrogations in criminal proceedings related to crimes committed in the context of an armed conflict, particularly in cases involving torture and the unlawful detention of civilians, the investigator must take into account the unique nature of this category of offences. Adherence to this approach is a key prerequisite for ensuring that witnesses and victims provide complete, logically consistent and meaningful testimony. Particular attention is paid to taking into account the specificities of working with individuals who have undergone traumatic experiences, and to providing the necessary support both before and after the interview. The practical value of the study lies in the identification of effective methods for the interrogation of victims and witnesses, aimed at obtaining the most comprehensive and informative testimony possible

References

  1. Chernovsky, O. (2018). Interrogation as a method of establishing the truth in criminal proceedings. Law of Ukraine, 4, 223-232.
  2. Chornous, Yu.M., & Vlasenko, S.O. (2022). Peculiarities of interrogation tactics during the investigation of illegal possession of a vehicle. Legal Psychology, 1(30), 74-79. doi: 10.33270/03223001.74.
  3. Denisovsky, M.D., & Rodenko, T.A. (2023). Tactical features of interrogation and their characteristics. Galician Studies, 1, 17-21. doi: 10.32782/galician_studies/law-2023-1-3.
  4. Dragan, O.V. (2024). Peculiarities of certain investigative actions and prosecutorial guidance under martial law. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 81(3), 185-190. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2024.81.3.27. 
  5. Dufeniuk, O. (2022). Investigation of war crimes in Ukraine: Challenges, standards, innovations. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, 1, 46-56. doi: 10.30525/2592-8813-2022-1-6.
  6. Fedorchuk, O.V. (2020). Interrogation of the suspect, victim and witnesses in the investigation of criminal thefts: Some tactical features of the conduct. Legal Science, 2(5(107), 158-167. doi: 10.32844/2222-5374-2020-107-5-2.20.
  7. Felyk, V., Tylchyk, V., Lemekha, R., Kurbatova, I., & Hmyrin, A. (2022). Prevention of crimes performed by the Russian Federation against humanity in Ukraine. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(73), 251-259. doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.4073.12.
  8. Glovyuk, I., Teteryatnik, G., Rogalska, V., & Zavtur, V. (2022). Special regime of pre-trial investigation, trial in conditions of war, state of emergency or in the area of conducting an anti-terrorist operation or measures to ensure national security and defense, repel and deter armed aggression of the Russian Federation and/or other states against Ukraine: scientific and practical commentary. Dnipro: Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs.
  9. Gotvianska, M.A. (2019). Tactics of interrogation of a minor involved in criminal activity (separate aspects). Bulletin of the Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. O. Didorenko, 2(86), 246-254. doi: 10.33766/2524-0323.86.246-257.
  10. GSU of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. (2025) Investigation of the facts of torture and cases of illegal detention of civilians by the Russian military during the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Kyiv: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine.
  11. Hrechana, S.I. (2023). Concepts, tasks and legal principles of interrogation during a pre-trial investigation in a court session by an investigating judge. Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law, 1, 243-252. doi: 10.32844/2618-1258.2023.1.42.
  12. Hrydkovets, L. (Ed.). (2023). Fundamentals of rehabilitation psychology: Overcoming the consequences of crisis. (Vol. 3). Kyiv: Svarog.
  13. Kobets, S.V. (2022). Peculiarities of interrogation of a witness and victim during the investigation of a threat or violence against a law enforcement officer. Electronic scientific publication Analytical and Comparative Law, 3, 232-237. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2022.03.42.
  14. Korabel, M.G., & Pavlenko, T.A. (2025). Interrogation of witnesses and victims of certain categories of war crimes and crimes of aggression. Collection of Scientific Works of the KhNPU Named After G.S. Skovoroda “Law”, 40, 137-142. doi: 10.34142/23121661.2024.40.16.
  15. Kostikov, I.Yu., Mariyko, V.V., Shcherbakova, Yu.V., Martynenko, S.V., Syrivlya, A.I, Sandalovich, B.O., & Abbasov, R.G. (2023). Use of achievements of science and technology in expert activities. Forensic Bulletin, 1(39), 10-28. doi: 10.37025/1992-4437/2023-39-1-10.
  16. Lepei, M.V. (2024). Tactics of interrogation of the victim and witnesses during the investigation of fraud. European Perspectives, 2, 311-316. doi: 10.32782/ep.2024.2.46.
  17. Megret, F. (2023). Massive violence against civilians in war: The ever-blurring line between a policy of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 21(3), 527-550. doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqad030.
  18. Nikitina-Dudikova, H.Yu. (2020). Tactics of interrogation of minor victims of crimes against sexual freedom and sexual integrity. Legal Psychology, 26, 77-84. doi: 10.33270/03202601.77.
  19. OSCE. (2009). Preventing torture: A handbook for OSCE field staff. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/498aaafd2.html.
  20. Osmolyan, V. (2024). Techniques for interrogating witnesses (victims) as a fundamental definition of forming testimony in criminal proceedings interregional academy of personnel management. Legal Sciences, 4(72), 28-32. doi: 10.32689/2522-4603.2024.4.5.
  21. Pashkovskyi, M.I., et al. (2023). Standards for the investigation of war crimes. General part. Kyiv: General Proecutor Office.
  22. Pasko, O.M., & Horoshko, V.V. (2022). Communicative readiness of the investigator as a necessary component of the interrogation of minors. South Ukrainian Legal Journal, 1-2, 273-277. doi: 10.32850/sulj.2022.1-2.48.
  23. Pletenets, V.M. (2022). Peculiarities of preparation for interrogation of minors on the facts of violent, sexual or tragic events under martial law. Science and Technology Today, 13(13), 67-76. doi: 10.52058/2786-6025-2022-13(13)-67-76.
  24. Popov, H., & Poiedynok, O. (2024). Working with victims of sexual violence in armed conflict: A guide for Ukrainian prosecutors. Kyiv: Council of Europe.
  25. Pylypenko, N. (2022). Psychological assistance and support for victims of war in Ukraine. Bulletin of the National University of Defense of Ukraine, 70(6), 142-148. doi: 10.33099/2617-6858-2022-70-6-142-148.
  26. Rogatinska, N., Halahan, O., Protsiuk, O., Galagan, S., & Fierieva, N. (2023). War crimes and crimes against humanity in Ukraine: Legal qualification and features of documentation. Cuestiones Políticas, 41(78), 143-165. doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.4178.10.
  27. Shelenina, K.H. (2021). Peculiarities of interrogation tactics in murders committed by convicts in places of detention. In Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference “Current problems of modern science in the research of young scientists” (pp. 171-174). Kharkiv: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.
  28. Shepitko, V.Yu. (2023). International standards for the use and research of digital information in the investigation of war crimes. In V.V. Cherniei, S.D. Husariev & S.S. Cherniavskyi (Eds.), Current issues of criminology and forensic examination: materials of interagency. science and practice conference (pp. 27-30). Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs.
  29. Shymko, V. (2025). Personality profiling through language: Assessment techniques for Big Five traits in psycholinguistic perspective. Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 175-192. doi: 10.31470/2309-1797-2025-38-1-175-192.
  30. Solovyova, O.E. (2025). Documentation and collection of evidence during the period of full-scale armed aggression of Russia against Ukraine. In Priorities of criminal justice and restoration of justice in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict. Materials of the round table (рр. 155-159). Kharkiv: Law. doi: 10.31359/9786178617103.
  31. Strok, I.A. (2022). Peculiarities of the tactics of conducting interrogations of victims and witnesses regarding the facts of destruction or damage to civilian property as a violation of the laws of war. In Training of law enforcement officers in the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine under martial law (pp. 328-330). Kharkiv: Ukraine.
  32. Synyuk, O. (2025). What should be the support system for victims of torture? Analytical note. Kyiv: Zmina.
  33. Zhovtiuk, O. (2024). Peculiarities of interrogation of witnesses and victims during the investigation of violations of the laws and customs of war. Legal Psychology, 1(34), 101-109. doi: 10.33270/03243401.101.
  34. Zlyvkov, V., & Lukomska, S. (2022). Features of resilience training in psychological rehabilitation of combatants. Bulletin of the National University of Defense of Ukraine, 65(1), 24-30. doi: 10.33099/2617-6858-2022-65-1-24-30.