en

Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Home
  • Volume 15, No. 4, 2025

  • Theoretical and legal analysis of certain aspects of forensic characterisation of violations of the laws and customs of war

  • Received 17.06.2025,
  • Revised 28.10.2025,
  • Accepted 25.11.2025
Download article Download article
Volume 15, No. 4, 2025
  • war crime; specifics of investigation; contextual circumstances; international law; emergency circumstances; martial law; proof process
  • https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-chasopis/4.2025.88
  • Pages 88-100

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to improve theoretical and practical approaches to the investigation of war crimes, ensuring their effective detection and documentation in the process of proof. The purpose of the study was a comprehensive investigation of the structural elements of the criminalistic characteristics of war crimes provided for in both Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, considering the practice of national and international courts, and the development of proposals for optimal ways of Investigation. The methodological basis of the research was formal legal, comparative legal, dogmatic, systematic methods, empirical study of investigative and judicial practice. The practical basis of the study was the materials of criminal proceedings on the fact of committing war crimes committed on the territory of Ukraine, and the case law of international (special) tribunals. As a result of the research, the content and structure of the criminalistic characteristics of war crimes were clarified, its significance for establishing the circumstances to be proved was determined, and key problems that affect the process of proof in an armed conflict were identified. Attention was paid to the contextual signs of violations of the laws and customs of war, which were integrated into the criminalistic characteristics of war crimes, as system-forming elements that determine the specifics of investigations, considering the method of commission, the mechanism of the event, the identity of the criminal and the victim, socially dangerous consequences, and their relationship with what was committed. For the first time, forensic signs of war crimes were systematised, considering international legal qualifications and specific conditions of investigation. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the possibility of their use in the practical activities of the pre-trial investigation bodies, the prosecutorʼs office and the court to increase the effectiveness in the investigation process and prove the guilt of persons involved in violations of the laws and customs of war

References

  1. Agarkova, O. (2024). Detection and recording of violations of the laws and customs of war as a direction of law enforcement agencies. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Jurisprudence, 68, 78-82. doi: 10.32782/2307-1745.2024.68.16.
  2. Anniversary of the missile strike on a residential high-rise building in Dnipro – Russia took the lives of 40 adults and 6 children. (2024). Retrieved from https://surl.li/vnvbfu.
  3. Antonyuk, N. (2023). Contextual element of war crimes: Content and necessity of establishment. Law of Ukraine, 5, 30-38. doi: 10.33498/louu-2023-05-030.
  4. Batyuk, O., & Dmytriv, S. (2021). On the issues of organizing war crimes investigations. Social & Legal Studies, 3(13), 77-87. doi: 10.32518/2617-4162-2021-3-77-87.
  5. Chaplynska, Yu. (2019). On the question of the essence and structure of the forensic characteristics of crimes. Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 3, 194-198. doi: 10.31733/2078-3566-2019-3-194-198.
  6. General Prosecutor Office. (2023). Standards for the investigation of war crimes. General part. Methodological recommendations. Retrieved from https://surl.li/rxhhym.
  7. Global Rights Compliance. (2016). Basic investigative standards for emergency response officers investigating international crimes. Retrieved from https://surl.li/wnzhqc.
  8. Grimal, F., & Pollard, M.J. (2024). A blurring of lines: The jus ad bellum past, present, and future. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 11(1-2), 4-15. doi: 10.1080/20531702.2024.2416336.
  9. Hlovyuk, I., & Teteryatnyk, G. (2022). Contextual elements in war crimes proceedings: a sui generis subject of proof. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 6, 394-398. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-6/87.
  10. Hryga, M., & Burnos, O. (2024). Documenting the cruel treatment of prisoners of war and civilians: Complications and challenges. Bulletin of the Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. Didorenko, 1(105), 266-275. doi: 10.33766/2786-9156.105.266-279.
  11. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2006). Customary international humanitarian law. Norms. Ukrainian Journal of International Law, 2, 7-16.
  12. Ka Lok, Y. (2022). Separationʼ between jus ad bellum and jus in bello as insulation of results, not scopes, of application. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4091411.
  13. Kolb, R. (1997). On the origin of the terminological pair ius ad bellum / ius in bello. Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge, 79(827), 593-602. doi: 10.1017/S003533610005187X.
  14. Kostiuk, I., & Sakovskyi, A. (2024). Characteristics of the qualification of exceeding authority or official authority by a military official personal by subjective characters. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 105(2), 96-109. doi: 10.32631/v.2024.2.33.
  15. Kuntiy, A. (2019). Tactics of an investigative experiment during the investigation of a premeditated murder committed in a state of strong emotional excitement. Comparative-Analytical Law, 4, 393-396.
  16. Kunz, J.L. (1939). The problem of revision in international law. American Journal of International Law, 33(1). 33-55. doi: 10.2307/2190837.
  17. Lazareva, D. (2025). Evidence in criminal proceedings regarding war crimes. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 1, 483-486. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2025-1/111.
  18. Liang, Z. (2021). Chinese perspectives on the ad bellum/in bello relationship and a cultural critique of the ad bellum/in bello separation in international humanitarian law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 291-320. doi: 10.1017/S0922156521000054.
  19. Peperkamp, L. (2020). Chapter 5. The relationship between jus ad bellum and jus post bellum. In jus post bellum. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004411043_006.
  20. Press Releases of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in Case Kunarac et al. (IT-96- 23 & 23/1). (1996). Retrieved from https://www.icty.org/en/case/kunarac.
  21. Rubanenko, N. (2024). Concept, typology and characteristics of international crimes: Systematic analysis. Forum of Law, 79(2), 84-95. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10933562.
  22. Sefriani, S. (2024). The dichotomy of jus ad bellum and jus ad bello in the 21st century: Its relevance and reconstruction. Journal of Law, 9(2), 210-230. doi: 10.22304/pjih.v9n2.a4.
  23. Shevchyshena, K. (2024). Investigation of war crimes in Ukraine. (Doctoral thesis, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine).
  24. Shulzhenko, A. (2022). Problems of proving the objective side in crimes of violation of the laws and customs of war. Bulletin of the Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E. Didorenko, 2(98), 261-270. doi: 10.33766/2524-0323.98.261-270.
  25. Taran, O. (2022). Circumstances that are subject to proof during the investigation of violations of the laws and customs of war. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 7, 413-416. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-7/100.
  26. Tolkach, A. (2023). Forensic characteristics of war crimes committed by the Russian army against the civilian population in the Chernihiv region from February 24 to April 2, 2022. Electronic Scientific Publication “Analytical and Comparative Law”, 4. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.66.
  27. Yankovy, M. (2023). Investigation of criminal offenses committed by military personnel during armed conflict: Problem statement. Academic Visions, 18. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7795218.
  28. Yefimenko, T. (2024). Peculiarities of evidence in criminal proceedings on war crimes. Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, 3(33), 284-294. doi: 10.32631/vca.2024.3.25.