Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 05.08.2024,
  • Revised 30.10.2024,
  • Accepted 26.11.2024
Download article Download article
Volume 14, No. 4, 2024
  • unlawful behaviour; offence; crime; punishment; prevention
  • https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-chasopis/4.2024.23
  • Pages 23-31

The relevance of this general theoretical study is conditioned by the growing number of offences in the country, which indicates problems in society and the state, including the insufficient effectiveness of legal liability, and the need to improve its regulatory framework and proper performance of functions. The study analysed the preventive and punitive functions of legal liability as essential factors of prevention of unlawful behaviour. The purpose of this study was to initiate a scientific discussion on the mechanisms of legal liability’s impact on unlawful behaviour, and to determine the possibilities of preventive and punitive functions in terms of preventing unlawful behaviour. The methodological framework of the study was based on formal-logical, systemic, and structural-functional methods employed within the framework of dialectical, phenomenological, and systemic approaches. The study resulted in the hypothesis that the normative model of legal liability (in the objective sense) can only serve as a general prevention of offences. The existence of a legal fact of an offence leads to legal liability in the subjective sense. At this stage, the punitive function is fully realised. Only the interaction of these functions will contribute to the implementation of the tasks of the institution of legal liability, primarily the prevention of offences. Thus, the functions of legal liability are its impact, practical implementation of the purpose which is expressed in establishing the legal limits of a person’s conduct by means of its incentives, coercion, or punishment; the key functions are preventive and punitive; the preventive function is aimed at prevention and deterrence of offences, which is achieved by establishing sanctions for their commission; the punitive function covers both the purpose of punishment and education, and is implemented at the individual level by force in a certain procedural form. The practical significance of this study is that law enforcement agencies can use the findings to formulate effective strategies for developing modern political- legal instruments for preventing unlawful behaviour

References

[1] Anderson, C.N., Cochran, J.C., & Montes, A.N. (2023). How punitive is pretrial? Measuring the relative pains of pretrial detention. Punishment and Society, 26(5), 790-812. doi: 10.1177/14624745231218702.

[2] Beccaria, C.B. (1764). An essay on crimes and punishments. Retrieved from https://files.libertyfund.org/files/2193/Beccaria_1476_EBk_v6.0.pdf.

[3] Bogutskyi, P. (2018). Inevitability of punishment in Ukrainian law. Retrieved from https://ukrainepravo.com/editor_column/donum-auctoris/nevidvorotnist-pokarannya-v-ukrayinskomu-pravi/

[4] Brown, D. (2019). Community sanctions as pervasive punishment: A review essay. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 9(2), 183-199. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.1208.

[5] Christie, N. (2004). A suitable amount of crime. Hove: Psychology Press.

[6] Countries with the largest number of prisoners per 100,000 of the national population, as of January 2024. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/262962/countries-with-the-most-prisoners-per-100-000-inhabitants/.

[7] Guan, X., & Lo, T.W. (2021) Restrictive deterrence in drug offenses: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of mixed studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, article number 727142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727142.

[8] Hayduk, Yu. (Ed.). (2024). How many prisoners are there in Ukraine in 2024: The exact number of people in prisons and pretrial detention centers. Retrieved from https://fakty.com.ua/ua/ukraine/20240522-skilky-uvyaznenyh-v-ukrayini-u-2024-roczi-tochna-kilkist-lyudej-v-tyurmah-i-sizo/.

[9] Hopkins, S. (2022). Beyond digital literacy in Australian prisons: Theorizing “network literacy”. Intersectionality, and female incarcerated students. Inclusive Media Literacy Education for Diverse Societies, 10(4), 382-390. doi: 10.17645/mac.v10i4.5734.

[10] Hsu, S.C., Chen, K.Y., Lin, C.P., & Su, W.H. (2022). Knowledge development trajectories of crime prevention domain: An academic study based on citation and main path analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), article number 10616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710616.

[11] Jouet, M. (2022). Foucault, prison, and human rights: A dialectic of theory and criminal justice reform. Theoretical Criminology, 26(2), 202-223. doi: 10.1177/13624806211015968.

[12] Maculan, E., & Gil, A.G. (2020). The rationale and purposes of criminal law and punishment in transitional contexts. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(1), 132-157. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqz033.

[13] Mahlangu, G., & Zivanai, E. (2023). Offender eLearning: A systematic literature review on re-entry, recidivism, and life after prison. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2246706.

[14] Marmot, M. (2018). Inclusion health: Addressing the causes of the causes. The Lancet, 391(10117), 186-188. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32848-9.

[15] Meinwald, C.C. (2024). Dialectic. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Plato/Dialectic.

[16] Mori, Y.E. (2020). Hikikomori: Why Japanese youth do not leave home and how not to become a hickey. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/culture/24044-hikikomori-comu-aponska-molod-ne-vihodit-z-domu-i-ak-ne-stati-hikki/.

[17] Morken, F., Jones, L.Ø., & Helland, W.A. (2021). Disorders of language and literacy in the prison population: A scoping review. Education Sciences, 11(2), article number 77. doi: 10.3390/educsci11020077.

[18] Polonka, I. (2018). The mechanism of illegal behavior in the theory of law: The authorʼs approachEntrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 6, 243-247.

[19] Quandt, K.R., & Jones, A. (2021). Research roundup: Incarceration can cause lasting damage to mental health. Retrieved from https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2021/05/13/mentalhealthimpacts/.

[20] Rahmadia, F. (2020). Theoretical and conceptual reflection regarding corporate criminal responsibilities influencing the formulation of laws. Lentera Hukum, 7(1), 17-36. doi: 10.19184/ejlh.v7i1.14297.

[21] Rubanenko, A.M. (2022). Legal responsibility in the structure of the legal status of foreigners and stateless persons. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 97(2), 214-220. doi: 10.32631/v.2022.2.19.

[22] Soto, M.E.N., Riega-Viru, Y., & Lara, J.C.O. (2021). Technology and crime prevention: A systematic review of literature. IEEEdoi: 10.1109/WorldS451998.2021.9514035.

[23] Teichmann, F., Wittmann, Ch., & Boticiu, S. (2023). Compliance as a form of defence against corporate criminal liability. Journal of Economic Criminology, 1, article number 100004. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100004.

[24] Torrente, G. (2024). Prison educators in the shadow of prison rules: Results from a field research in Italy. Oñati Socio-Legal Seriesdoi: 10.35295/osls.iisl.2052.

[25] Trajtenberg, N., & Ezquerra, P. (2024). “Lock them up and throw away the key”: An evaluation of the structure of punitive attitudes. Psychiatry, Psychology and Lawdoi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2296476.

[26] Turney, K., Wildeman, C., & Schnittke, J. (2012). As fathers and felons: Explaining the effects of current and recent incarceration on major depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(4), 465-481. doi: 10.1177/0022146512462400.

[27] Tymoshenko, V.I. (2024). Sociological theories of the state and law: History and modernity. Kyiv: Publishing House of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28] UNESCO. (2021). Education in prison. Review of francophone literature. Hambourg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.

[29] Wallace, D., & Wang, X. (2020). Does in-prison physical and mental health impact recidivism? SSM  Population Health, 11, article number 100569. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100569.

[30] Zawadzki, P. (2024). The abolition of punishment: Is a non-punitive criminal justice system ethically justified? Diametros, 21(79). doi: 10.33392/diam.1987.