Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

  • Received 16.03.2023,
  • Revised 16.03.2023,
  • Accepted 16.03.2023
Download article Download article
Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020
  • prosecutor; criminal procedural activity; prosecutor; public prosecution; prosecutorial supervision; procedural management.
  • https://doi.org/10.33270/04202002.103
  • Pages 96-104

Turbulent changes in legislation in recent years have laid fertile ground for scientists. Sometimes, for some time, laws governing criminal procedural relations are passed so quickly and strangely that they only harm the interests of the state and complicate the work of the prosecutor-procedural manager during the investigation of criminal proceedings. In this regard, the question of the role and place of the prosecutor in the mechanism of ensuring the rights and freedoms of citizens in the criminal proceedings, the implementation of its functions and powers remains open. This is confirmed by the amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine adopted in July 2016, which are still not implemented in other laws of Ukraine four years later. The updated status of the prosecutor enshrined in the Basic Law of Ukraine creates a new basis for the procedural tactics of investigating criminal proceedings. In view of the above, it is necessary to investigate the new legislation, empirical results and the practical component of the prosecutor’s activities. The paper considers the functional algorithm of actions of the prosecutor-procedural manager on the investigation of criminal offenses. The purpose of the article is to characterize the features of the procedural status of the prosecutor as a subject of criminal proceedings in the investigation of crimes, the component of this activity as a supervisor or prosecutor in criminal proceedings, comparing such powers and determining the nature of such activities by their number in law. Methodology. To achieve this goal, the formal-logical method, system-structural, comparative-legal, and statistical methods are used. Scientific novelty. By analyzing the provisions of recent changes in legislation and judicial and prosecutorial practice, the main direction of the prosecutor’s work as a prosecutor in criminal proceedings has been established. Attention is paid to the specifics of the prosecutor’s procedural tactics at the stage of pre-trial investigation and in court, its focus on the reasonable involvement of a person who has committed a criminal offense in order to pass a court conviction. Conclusions. The role and functional content of the criminal procedural activity of the prosecutor in the Ukrainian judiciary are established. At present, he is primarily a prosecutor, with a small number of supervisory powers, which is why the prosecutor’s supervisory functions are defined as secondary. At the same time, the prosecutor is the determining and main participant in the criminal proceedings, as he acts at all its stages from the beginning of the criminal proceedings to its end.

References

[1] Alenin, Yu.P. (2009). Criminal procedure law of Ukraine. Kharkiv: Odissei.

[2] Dvornyk, A. (2013). Powers of the prosecutor in pre-trial criminal proceedings. Bulletin of the Prosecutor's Office, 8, 122-128.

[3] Hloviuk, I. (2013). Procedural guidance of the prosecutor by pre-trial investigation. Bulletin of the Prosecutor's Office, 12, 79-88.

[4] Karkach, P.M. (2018). Some issues of prosecutorial activity in the field of crime prevention. Lawyer of Ukraine, 2, 87-92.

[5] Constitution of Ukraine No. 254k/96-VR. (1996, June). Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 20(2), 103-111 Rohatiuk 109

[6] Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine from No. 4651-VI. (2012, April). Retrieved from http://zakon0. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17

[7] Kurbatova, I.S. (2020). The prosecutor in criminal proceedings: theoretical and applied problems of realization by the state of the constitutional rights of the person and the citizen monohrafiya. Irpin: Sate Tax University.

[8] Lapkin, A.V. (2019). On determining the purpose, tasks and functions of the prosecutor’s office. Legal Horizons, 17, 97-101.

[9] Makbraid, Dzh. (2010) European Convention on Human Rights and Criminal Procedure. Kyiv: K.I.S.

[10]Marochkin, I.E., & Karkach, P.M. (2004). Prosecutorial supervision in Ukraine. Kharkiv: Odissei.

[11]Order of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine “On the organization of prosecutorial supervision over the observance of laws by bodies conducting operational and investigative activities” No. 4/1gn. (2012, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0004900-12#Text

[12]Order of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine “About the statement of the Order of the organization of activity of prosecutors and investigative bodies of prosecutor’s office in criminal proceedings” No. 51. (2019, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0363-19#Text

[13]Pohoretskyi, M.A. (2015). Prosecutor in criminal proceedings: On the definition of functions. Law of Ukraine, 6, 86-95.

[14]PACE Recommendation 1604 (2003) 11 “On the role of public prosecutors in a democratic society based on the rule of law” (2003, May). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/T/r/Parliamentary_Assembly/ [Russian_documents]/[2003]/Rec1604.asp Text

[15]Rohatiuk, I.V. (2007). Accusations in the criminal process of Ukraine. Kyiv: Atika.

[16]Rohatiuk, I.V. (2017). Prosecutors support of public prosecution in court: procedural tactics in nonstandard conditions. Law Magazine of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 1(13), 87-93.

[17]Guidelines on the Role of prosecutors, The Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, August 27 – September 7. (1990, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_859#Text

[18]Savitskiy, V.M. (1975). Essay on the theory of prosecutorial supervision in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Nauka.

[19]Tatarov, O.Yu. (2012). Pre-trial proceedings in the criminal process of Ukraine: Theoretical, legal and organizational principles (according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs). Kyiv: Promin.

[20]Law of Ukraine “On the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine” No. 1698-VII (2014, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1698-18#Text

[21]Law of Ukraine “About operativesearch activity” No. 2135-ХІІ. (1992, February). Retrieved from https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2135-12#Text

[22]Law of Ukraine “On the Security Service of Ukraine”. No. 2229-ХІІ. (1992, March) Retrieved from https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2229-12#Text

[23]Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning Priority Measures to Reform the Prosecutors Office”. No. 113-IX. (2019, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/113-20#n53

[24]Law of Ukraine “On amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine (on justice)” No. 1401-VІII (2016, June) Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1401-19#n6

[25]Report on the results of the study 2016-2017 “The role of the prosecutor at the pre-trial stage of the criminal process”. (2017). Retrieved from https://ecpl.com.ua/analytics/rol-prokurora-na-dosudovijstadiji-kryminalnohoprotsesu/