ISSN 2519-4216
e-ISSN 2519-4313
UDC 34
Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs
- corruption; corruption crime; corruption offense; counteracting corruption; official; confiscation; undue advantage.
- https://doi.org/10.33270/04202002.21
- Pages 21-32
The purpose of the article is to identify major problematic issues related to the construction of criminal law provisions in the area of corruption offenses, both in the Criminal Code of Ukraine and in the draft General Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine of 2020, as well as to identify ways to solve them. The article employs a set of research methods, namely: terminological, system-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal. The theoretical basis of the study is constituted by the works of Ukrainian and foreign scientists, by provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, as well as by the practice of their application. The scientific novelty of the article is based on the following: 1) the problems of determining a corruption offense and ways to solve them have been revealed; 2) shortcomings in the definition of corruption, provided for in the draft General Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine 2020 and formulates proposals for their elimination have been identified; 3) main advantages and disadvantages of the list of corruption offenses contained in the note to Art. 45 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine have been identified; 4) classification of corruption criminal offenses according to the method and subject of their commission has been improved; 5) the content, positive and negative sides of the criminal-legal consequences of a corruption criminal offense have been revealed. According to the results of the study, the following conclusions have been drawn: 1) the lack of definition of the term «corruption criminal offense» in the Criminal Code of Ukraine does not allow to clearly understand the criminal nature of this group of violations, and, accordingly, to establish criminal offenses and crimes that belong to them; 2) when creating such definition, it should be taken into account that it must be consistent with the definition of a criminal offense, corruption offense and corruption; 3) the concept of a tripartite understanding of illicit gain (as the subject, purpose and means of crime commission) in the definition of corruption should be transformed into a construction, such as «acts consisting in the offer or promise of illicit gain, its provision, acceptance or promise of such benefit, its receipt, request or extortion to provide»; 4) as presented in the note to Art. 45 of the Criminal Code, the list of corruption offenses, on the one hand, does not cover all criminal offenses that should be attributed to corruption, and on the other – includes some criminal offenses, which should not be attributed to corruption; 5) it is proposed to divide corruption criminal offenses according to the method of commission into: a) illegal possession of certain property by abuse of official position by a public official; b) abuse of power, official position or authority; c) an offer, a promise to provide an illegal benefit, as well as the provision of such a benefit for committing or failing to commit certain acts (active bribery); d) acceptance of an offer or promise of such benefit, its receipt, request or demand to provide (passive bribery); e) other corrupt criminal and illegal acts (conditionally corruption, quasi-corruption and criminal offenses, which have been unreasonably included in the note of Article 45 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); 6) analysis of the negative criminal law consequences of a corruption criminal offense demonstrates that the legislator in certain cases has equated these torts to serious and especially serious crimes; 7) in the context of reforming criminal legislation, it is necessary to improve the grounds for various types of confiscation, prohibition to engage in certain activities or hold certain positions, as well as to consider the feasibility of criminalizing concealment of corruption offenses.
References
[1] Cherniavskyi, S.S., & Vozniuk, A.A. (2019). Foreign experience of legal counteraction to illicit enrichment. Law Journal of National Academy of Internal Affairs, 17(1), 79-89.
[2] Codice Penale of Italy. Aggiornato. (2020, October). Retrieved from https://www.brocardi.it/ codicepenale/libro-terzo/titolo-i/capo-i/sezione-i/art650.html.
[3] Dudorov, O.O., Kolomoiets, T.O., Kushnir, S.M., & Makarenkov, O.L. (2019). General theoretical, administrative and criminal-legal bases of conceptualization of anti-corruption reform in Ukraine. Zaporizhia: Helvetyka.
[4] Khavroniuk, M.I. (2018). Scientific and practical commentary to the Law of Ukraine “On Prevention of Corruption”. Kyiv: Vaite.
[5] Klitgaard, R. (1998). International cooperation against corruption. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/ external/Pubs/ FT/fandd/1998/03/pdf/klitgaar.pdf.
[6] Maggio, P. (2020). A critical analysis of corruption and anti-corruption policies in Italy. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 513-530.
[7] Muzyka, A.A., & Lashhuk, Ye.V. (2011). The subject of the crime: The theoretical foundations of knowledge. Kyiv: Palyvoda A.V.
[8] Nathanson, S. (2013). Why good government matters. Crime, Law and Social Change, 1(60), 107-114.
[9] The project of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2020, October). Retrieved from https:// newcriminalcode.org.ua/upload/media/2020/10/21/kontrolnyj-proekt-kk-19-102020.pdf
[10]Rothstein, B. (2013). Corruption and social trust: Why the fish rots from the head down. Social Research, 4(80), 1009-1032.
[11]Seligson, M.A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408-433.
[12]Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2017, February). Retrieved from http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/ view/ru-ru/111527
[13]Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014, July). Retrieved from https://online.zakon.kz/ Document/?doc_id=31575252#pos=38;-50
[14]Vozniuk, A.A. (2019). Real causes of top corruption in Ukraine and unrealistic ways to counter it. In Realization of the State Anti-Corruption Policy in the International Dimension: Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific-Practical Conference (pp. 44-47). Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs. 5. Analysis of the negative criminal and legal consequences of a criminal corruption offence shows that the legislator in certain cases equated these torts with grievous and extremely grievous crimes. In addition, the absence of differentiation of criminal-legal consequences for different types of criminal corruption offences in certain cases does not correspond to the principle of fairness. The refusal in the draft Criminal Code of Ukraine from restrictions on criminal corruption offences, which are enshrined in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, cannot be assessed unambiguously. On the one hand, the criminal-legal consequences of committing these torts violate the principles of criminal law, and therefore, it would probably be possible to predict that the Constitutional Court of Ukraine could eventually declare them unconstitutional. Although, on the other hand, they have a certain potential to deter from committing corrupt criminal offences. 6. In the context of criminal law reform, attention should be focused on improving the grounds for applying different types of confiscation, but it is important that they do not contend with each other and that they are not used for committing the same act, since this may lead to a violation of the “ne bis in idem” principle. For persons who have committed corrupt criminal offences, lifetime bans on engaging in certain activities or holding certain positions can be applied as a punishment, or at least increase the minimum and maximum limits of this punishment provided for in part 1 of Art. 55 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The criminalization of concealing a corrupt criminal offence within an independent form of the objective side of a criminal offence also requires attention. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 20(2), 21-32 Vozniuk 31
[15]The verdict of the Dnieper Court of Appeal. No. 205/3186/20. (2020, November). Retrieved from http:// reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/92942232
[16]The verdict of the Manevychi district court of the Volyn. No. 164/1490/20. (2020, November). Retrieved from http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/92948294
[17]Law of Ukraine “On Prevention of Corruption”. No. 1700-VII. (2014, October). Retrieved from https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1700-18